Well I haven’t written for a few days as I’ve been mulling over a number of contradictions in life and they weren’t clear enough in my head to put pen to paper. But I think I’m now ready to verbalise.
The first contradiction is “being happy and appreciative with what you have and are” vs “being dissatisfied enough to want to improve and want more”. I’ve really been struggling with this one. I’m very lucky to have a wonderful husband, children and life and I really appreciate this or at least try to. This causes 2 dilemmas for me:
- having it so good now I feel guilty to want to have more both materially and emotionally
- if I strive for more then maybe it will jeopardise what I have now
I’m trying to align this contradiction…somewhere along the lines of really appreciating what I have whilst opening myself up to opportunity. I’m concluding that maybe by thinking positively and believing I “can have my cake and eat it to” this contradiction can be eliminated.
The second contradiction is related to values….the key ones for me being honesty and integrity. My dilemma here is that I’m seeing in life that honesty does not always seem to be the best policy.
When it comes to dealing with companies, especially global companies or government, it’s all about policy and procedures. To ensure “standardisation”, often to the lowest common denominator, they remove the “human element” to take out judgment and by default accountability. In fact, they rely on the human values of the customer and often manipulate these to make more profit whilst not being accountable to maintain any type of moral values themselves (how can they, they are not human but instead a legal entity) eg. issuing credit card debt beyond what people can afford knowing that people’s values will drive them to continue to maintain their minimum monthly payments. Their only mantra is to make more profit or, in the case of government, more bureaucracy.
So is it appropriate for us, as individuals, to provide out greatest asset (our honesty and integrity) as customers to companies/governments when they do not hold true to such values? I think not. If they are not accountable nor should we be. We should not bring human emotions such as “guilt” into this relationship. We should manipulate their policy and procedures as much as they try to manipulate our values.
This, however, is a very different scenario to dealing directly with individuals. This is an equal relationship…you look them in the eye, we are “real” to one another. This is where our values are appropriate and appreciated. If the other person abuses your trust, they are the ones accountable for the consequences of their action eg. guilt or “what goes around comes around”. This is where values are really valued…and not manipulated.